West Indies remained firmly on top after three days of attritional
cricket in Barbados, where Darren Sammy's early strikes and Devendra
Bishoo's variations kept Australia's batsmen from making significant
progress. At stumps on day three Australia were 248 for 5, with Michael
Hussey on 47 and Matthew Wade on 19, and while they had almost passed
the follow-on mark they were not yet safe in the match.
The big challenge for West Indies remained finding a way to turn their
impressive performance into a victory. Rain again played a part on the
third afternoon and their task for the final two days was to run through
Australia's lower order quickly, bat again and set the visitors a
target, and then skittle them a second time. The way this match has
unfolded so far, that looked like it would be easier said than done.
But through Sammy and his colleagues West Indies had at least put
themselves in the much stronger position. Last time the two sides met in
a Caribbean Test series, the hosts had several days of inspired cricket
but were unable to string together enough in one match to take a
victory from Australia. This time they had started with two encouraging
days, and worked through the third in the same fashion.
Michael Clarke provided Australia with a fighting half-century but threw
his wicket away, while Shane Watson and David Warner also failed to
capitalise on solid starts. Watson was also accountable for the ugly
run-out of Ricky Ponting, a calamitous confusion that left Ponting
fuming as he walked off the field.
The pair had come together after Sammy removed both openers in almost
identical fashion, pitching the ball on off stump and nipping it away
from the left-handers Warner and Ed Cowan. Cowan was on 14 when his thin
edge found the wicketkeeper and Warner had made a promising start and
had 42 when he edged to second slip, and Sammy's accuracy and
persistence was impressive.
Those strikes were followed by the run-out of Ponting for 4 when Watson
turned the ball behind square leg and took a single, and then called for
the second, hesitated, and called Ponting through again. The throw from
the deep to the wicketkeeper's end found a confused Ponting out of his
ground as Watson loitered halfway down the pitch and Ponting's
frustration was evident.
Watson was nearly involved in another run-out later when Clarke was
saved only by a wayward throw. That, together with poor use of the
review system, were the only real blemishes that could be attached to
the West Indies fielding effort. Twice Watson survived lbw appeals that
could easily have gone against him, once when he offered no shot to a
prodigious inswinger from Sammy, who asked for a review and saw the
replays show a perilously close prediction that had the ball hitting off
stump, but only in the "umpire's call" zone.
In the next over, Kemar Roach appealed for lbw against Watson and also
received a not-out verdict. This time Sammy decided against asking for a
review but replays showed the ball would have struck enough of leg
stump to have the decision overturned. West Indies wasted their second
review after lunch when Sammy was off the ground and the vice-captain
Kirk Edwards asked for the third umpire to check another Roach lbw
appeal that was clearly sliding down leg.
But those errors of judgment didn't prove too costly. Watson threw his
wicket away in the first over after lunch when he flashed impetuously at
Roach and was caught behind for 39. It was hardly the innings Australia
needed from Watson in his first Test batting at No.3. Clarke and
Michael Hussey led a fightback with an 82-run partnership and they had
to work hard against Bishoo, whose variations kept them from scoring
freely.
Clarke used his feet against the legspinner and lofted him straight down
the ground for six, but otherwise the Australians typically waited for
poor balls from Bishoo and did the best they could to keep the good ones
out. Clarke brought up his half-century from his 121st delivery with a
fine cover-driven boundary from the part-time offspin of Narsingh
Deonarine, and he was fortunate to have got there after a contentious
review when he was on 27.
Clarke was adjudged caught behind off a Bishoo ball that stayed low and
he immediately challenged the out decision from the umpire Tony Hill.
Replays did not clearly show that he hit the ball but nor did there seem
to be overwhelming evidence to overturn the call, but that was what
happened and it was a serious let-off for Clarke.
Eventually, Bishoo had his reward when Clarke tried to clear long-off
but succeeded only in skying a catch, and it was an unwise shot
selection at a time when Clarke and Hussey needed to continue building
their partnership. Hussey was more watchful and by stumps was
approaching a half-century, and Wade struggled against Bishoo with a
packed close-in field, but he was good enough to put away the bad balls
when they came.
Bishoo's challenge on the fourth day will be to run through the tail,
although with the new ball due Sammy will first turn to his fast men to
do that job. And if they can manage it, victory will be a possibility,
although a draw remains the more likely outcome.


0 comments:
Post a Comment